Advertisement
Share
Local News

Citing home’s scale, CPA tables Hidden Valley project

LJCPA trustee Bob Steck says those opposed to the Jones Residence development were not given enough time to develop a presentation.
LJCPA trustee Bob Steck says those opposed to the Jones Residence development were not given enough time to develop a presentation.
(Ashley Mackin)

During an otherwise short meeting of La Jolla Community Planning Association (LJCPA) Aug. 4 at La Jolla Rec Center, residents and trustees debated the Jones Residence project in the Hidden Valley area for more than an hour. Grappling with everything from community concerns to parliamentary procedures, the board ultimately decided to continue the discussion at its September meeting.

Requesting a Site Development Permit and Coastal Development Permit to demolish a 1,961-square-foot single-family residence and construct a new 4,975-square-foot split-level single-family residence with attached garage and pool at 2315 Rue De Anne, Brian Will presented the project. Will is also a LJCPA trustee and La Jolla Development Permit Review Committee (DPR) member.

The project has gone through several design revisions, with neighbors and the La Jolla Shores Permit Review Committee (PRC) examining the project at each stage. In May, Will presented the most recent design to area residents and the PRC, who approved the plans pending an updated soils report. PRC gave final approval in July, 4-1-1.

Insisting the design would preserve neighbor privacy, not cast an inconvenient shadow at any time of day and be set back far enough into the adjacent hillside to minimize the perceived bulk and scale, Will said the proposed development was “almost hidden” from the street and surrounding residents.

Advertisement

Will said the plans meet all the requirements of the San Diego Municipal Code and area design guidelines. Showing homes that have had “major work” over the last 35 years, Will offered a comparison chart indicating the planned Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of his development and of surrounding properties, and said other area homes are bigger by FAR than what he is proposing.

However, land-use attorney Julie Hamilton, representing neighbors opposed to the project, argued that just because it is the smallest by FAR, does not mean it is the smallest house on the street. “This home is too big and out of character with Rue de Anne,” she said.

Land-use attorney Julie Hamilton speaks for neighbors opposed to the Jones Residence development.
Land-use attorney Julie Hamilton speaks for neighbors opposed to the Jones Residence development.
(Ashley Mackin)

Hamilton added that two houses on that street are on historic registries, one of which is surrounded by glass to “bring the outdoors in,” and that the proposed development would negatively impact architecturally significant features of the surrounding historic homes.

Advertisement

“When you build a house next to an existing house, it is going to impact the historicity of the house … and that is a significant issue,” she said, pointing out that there are only two, two-story houses in the area, all others are one story. “The more two-story houses you allow, the more you change the character of the neighborhood and the more likely it is that the next two-story house will be allowed.”

In addition to the debate on the merits of the project and neighbor concerns, trustees voiced concern over the meeting protocol. LJCPA trustee Bob Steck said the item was pulled from the agenda only a few days before the meeting, and that “90 percent of the time when that happens, it (is heard) the following month.” He said, “By hearing it this month, the opposition was only given a few days to create a presentation. It’s a fairness issue.”

LJCPA Chair Cindy Greatrex explained cases like this are a matter of discretion, and because there was a short agenda in August, she decided to add the item. However, because the board could not come to a majority decision, the discussion was postponed until September.

In other LJCPA news:

Map waiver denied: Convinced by the findings of La Jolla’s DPR committee, LJCPA quickly ratified the recommendation to deny a Coastal Development Permit and tentative map waiver for the conversion of three existing dwelling units to three residential condominium units at 7432, 7434 and 7436 Fay Ave.

DPR provided, as part of its findings, several reasons to deny the conversion, including: the proposal is inconsistent with neighborhood development pattern that is predominately two units per property/parcel, there are too many unknowns regarding potential new development and its effects on neighborhood character, and more.

Pulled for review: Although additional items may be pulled before the next meeting, one item was already moved for full review in September: the Cardenas Residence project. Applicants request a Site Development Permit and Coastal Development Permit to demolish a 3,113-square-foot single-family residence and construct a new 6,698-square-foot single-family residence with attached garage at 8466 El Paseo Grande in La Jolla Shores. When heard at PRC, it was determine findings could be made for the requested documents.

UCSD working group: At the September meeting, a working group of UC San Diego planners and LJCPA members will make their first report. With an inaugural meeting set for Aug. 24, Greatrex explained, “The purpose is to understand development on the campus as part of the 2018 Long Range Development plan (and report back). We’ll continue to report on a regular basis.”

— Next meeting: LJCPA will convene 6 p.m. Thursday, Sept. 1 at La Jolla Rec Center, 615 Prospect St. lajollacpa.org

Advertisement


Advertisement