LaJollaLight.com | Marine Life Protection Act will have negative impacts

Marine Life Protection Act will have negative impacts

Jul 29, 2010

By Carl Lind
La Jolla resident
In response to the July 15 'Reasons to back protection act, here are some important points. To understand California's Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) it is important to know that it is not a scientific creation. It is political, approved by the legislature largely along party lines. At its heart is the attempt to ban sport fishing along much of California's coastline by establishing "no-take" marine reserves.

Primary support for the MLPA comes from research institutions and the animal rights lobby. A motivation for the former is the desperately needed millions of dollars in potential study grants for the proposed reserves.

MLPA activists deceptively argue that the "oceans are in crisis."

They neglect to say that California's Department of Fish & Game has provided excellent stewardship of the state's ocean waters. Certainly there are some problems, but no-take reserves are not the answer to any of them because they actually prohibit marine management. To create such a reserve, a boundary is established in an ocean area, and whatever happens within that area - is allowed to happen. It's a Utopian, "nature knows best" approach that ignores real dangers to our environment.

One only has to see the hordes of sea lions along San Francisco's waterfront, damaging boats and docks, eating marine resources and polluting the water to understand this. La Jolla has its own escalating pinniped problem.

Fortunately, all cities now have the right, under federal law, to control nuisance marine mammals. This right ceases to exist within the proposed MLPA no-take reserves. Why would any coastal city willingly give up its option to control problem animals by acquiescing to MLPA? Claims that existing no-take marine reserves are "successful" are mostly anecdotal. So many variables exist (e.g., water temperature, pollution, marine mammal predation) that scientific experiments are nearly impossible to replicate.

The negative effects of the MLPA will be both environmental and economic. It should be revised or abolished.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Although the La Jolla Light does not have any obligation to monitor this board, the La Jolla Light reserves the right at all times to check this board and to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable to the La Jolla Light in our sole discretion and to disclose any information necessary to satisfy the law, regulation, or government request. The La Jolla Light also reserves the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions. All threats to systems or site infrastructure shall be assumed genuine in nature and will be reported to the appropriate law enforcement authorities. Submission of any comments will be considered permission to use online or in print.

© Copyright 2008 MainStreet Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Any copying, redistribution or retransmission of any of the contents of this service without the express written consent of MainStreet Media, LLC. is expressly prohibited.