La Jolla planning association requests revisions to confusing Shores rebuild plans

Gricel Cedillo and Luis Gutierrez of Callisto Architects presents plans for a new two-story, 11,696-square-foot residence in La Jolla Shores at the Dec. 6 meeting. Pat Sherman
Gricel Cedillo and Luis Gutierrez of Callisto Architects presents plans for a new two-story, 11,696-square-foot residence in La Jolla Shores at the Dec. 6 meeting. Pat Sherman
photo
Gricel Cedillo and Luis Gutierrez of Callisto Architects presents plans for a new two-story, 11,696-square-foot residence in La Jolla Shores at the Dec. 6 meeting. Pat Sherman

By Pat Sherman

During its Dec. 6 meeting, the La Jolla Community Planning Association (LJCPA) requested that problematic La Jolla Shores home rebuild plans be revised and resubmitted to the LJCPA in the future.

Interior designer Gricel Cedillo presented plans for the Gaxiola Residence at 2414 Calle de Oro, which includes demolition of an existing one-story, 3,178-square-foot home, to be replaced by a two-story, 11,696-square-foot residence with four bedrooms, seven bathrooms, a two-car garage, attached guest quarters and swimming pool on 29,120 square feet. Approximately 4,744-square feet of the project would be considered a “phantom floor,” or ground-level uninhabitable space.

In October, the La Jolla Development Permit Review Committee (DPR) voted that findings could be made for approval of site and coastal development permits for the project.

However, LJCPA members found too many variables with current Gaxiola Residence plans for their comfort. LJCPA board member Phil Merten said the structure’s flat- roof, contemporary architecture conflicted with an adjacent gable-tyle roof and several one-story ranch-style houses in the area.

Merten expressed further concerns about a 10-foot-tall retaining wall in front of the home that would support the swimming pool. Questions arose as to the length of the wall, and whether it had been included on earlier drawings submitted to the city.

“If this wall is a problem, it can go away,” Cedillo said. “If the wall isn’t in the city plans, we’re not even going to be able to put it there.”

“I am just not ... sure we even ought to vote on a project when there’s such an inaccuracy in the renderings you’re showing us,” board member Laura Ducharme Conboy said. “I know that artistic license means that you can wiggle some things around, but if we’re to understand that a wall stretching the full distance of a rendering is actually only on a portion of it ... I recommend that you take your drawings back and correct them. ... There’s not enough information here that I can rely on.”

LJCPA Board President Tony Crisafi suggested the applicant return at a later date with modified drawings that are clearer and that show how the project complies with La Jolla Shores landscaping regulations.

In other LJCPA news n Tying the Lot: LJCPA

• Tying the Lot:

LJCAPA members reacted more favorably to a proposed Bird Rock home rebuild at 5328 and 5334 Calumet Ave., voting 12-1-1 that findings could be made for site and coastal development permits for the project.

It calls for demolition of two existing structures totaling 8,042 square feet and construction of a new 7,308-square-foot, single-story home with a spa and 2,820-square-foot basement on 15,201 square feet.

Though the DPR committee voted in favor of the permit requests in October, the item was previously pulled from the LJCPA agenda due to questions regarding the lot-tie agreement.

The applicant proposed to reduce the project’s width by three feet to increase side views, said attorney Matt Peterson, who represented the applicant during the LJCPA meeting. A spacious, central entry window would also preserve access to some coastal views, he said.

Page:
   
-

Comments

Be relevant, respectful, honest, discreet and responsible. Commenting Rules