Consultant addresses cleanup of gas station slated for condo project in La Jolla

Unocal 76 on Pearl Street could be replaced with condos and retail space. Photo by Pat Sherman

By Pat Sherman

The La Jolla Development Permit Review (DPR) subcommittee heard details last week about the removal of an existing gas station at the corner of Eads Avenue and Pearl Street, where the property owner hopes to develop a mixed-use, residential-retail project.

Questions about potential migration of soils contaminated by gasoline and other petroleum products were raised during last month’s DPR meetings, where the project was first presented by architect Alex Faulkner and land use and planning consultant Joe LaCava.

Chuck Houser, an environmental consultant and hydro-geologist (one who studies the distribution and movement of groundwater in soil and rocks of the Earth’s crust), offered a presentation on the proposed cleanup, fielding questions from DPR trustees and attendees.

Some petroleum hydrocarbons (like those found in oil-based products) are naturally occurring in the Earth’s subsurface, he said.

Whether natural or having seeped into the ground from gas tanks or the existing service station, Houser said they will be monitored during excavation for the underground garage.

“This is not rocket science,” he said. “We can keep very good control of what’s going on.”

Though Houser said it is “highly likely” work crews will encounter contaminants during the process, he said the majority of them would probably be hydrocarbons with low volatility and migration levels.

“Oil is far less of a potential health risk then diesel, which is far less than gasoline,” he said, adding that bacteria in the soil naturally eat away some hydrocarbons.

“A community health and safety plan is part of the property mitigation,” Houser said, assuring that his crew would have an on-site lab to monitor any hydrocarbon vapors or dust that might be pushed into the air during excavation.

A notice about the work will be delivered to residents in the immediate vicinity, and crews will also test for the presence of lead.

“We’ll analyze until we’re not detecting it,” he said. “My cell phone number is going to be on that notice, so if a neighbor in the area is concerned about something they see or smell, I get a phone call and I will deal with that.”

Any contamination in the subsurface will be cleaned up and removed to the lowest point of the garage, he said.

Artist rendering of a two-building mixed-use project proposed for the (former gas station) corner of Eads Avenue and Pearl Street. Plans include a mix of condominiums, retail space and a restaurant. Courtesy

If it is believed contamination exists below that level, it will be noted in county reports that will be available online.

The consultant must demonstrate to the county that any remaining hydrocarbons will not present a risk to adjacent homes.

“We give them recommendations, and they evaluate those recommendations,” Houser said. “The county wants a less than one-in-a million-chance that someone’s going to get sick.”

Houser said the water table is about 30-feet below the surface, and that the excavation would not get “anywhere near close to that.”

He said the soil would be taken to a disposal facility in Otay Mesa, or it could be heat-processed elsewhere and used as ground cover at a landfill.

DPR chair Paul Benton said city and county geologists will review the cleanup process, and raise their own questions.

Removal of third story

Perhaps most concerning to neighbors at the previous DPR meeting was a third-story proposed for the real residential building along Eads Avenue.

Faulkner said he has since removed the third story from his plans, moving those two condominium units to some “leftover space” (above) the commercial units of the two-story building along Pearl Street.

Though residents expressed concerns about the garage driveway being located off Eads Avenue, LaCava said after further consideration, it was determined that to avoid traffic congestion, Eads was still the best location.

“The city has kind of agreed in that direction,” LaCava said. “We think it’s better for the neighborhood … and it’s going to be safer for everybody all around.

“The rest of the project would remain about the same,” he added.

Additional concerns broached during the meeting included: the perceived reduction of common space required by the community plan; the steepness and safety of the portion of the driveway nearest the sidewalk; and the redistribution of density from the front of the property to the rear (the latter of which is zoned for a lower-density residential use).

The applicant will return to a future DPR meeting with revised plans for the trustees’ final vote on the project.

Related posts:

  1. La Jolla mixed-use project would replace Unocal 76 gas station on Pearl Street
  2. Residents oppose size, density of La Jolla Unocal 76 gas station redevelopment
  3. La Jolla community planners to consider use, definition of ‘basements’ at Aug. 1 meeting
  4. Planning association approves scaled-down Bird Rock project
  5. Roundabout reasoning revisited

Short URL: http://www.lajollalight.com/?p=113655

Posted by Pat Sherman on Sep 17, 2013. Filed under Featured Story, La Jolla, News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Bottom Buttons 1

Bottom Buttons 2

Bottom Buttons 3

Bottom Buttons 4

Bottom Buttons 5

Bottom Buttons 6

RSS North Coastal News