http://www.lajollalight.com/2013/01/29/la-jollans-attend-vigil-for-irving-gill%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%98windemere%e2%80%99/ Enlightening La Jolla since 1913 Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:40:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3 http://www.lajollalight.com/2013/01/29/la-jollans-attend-vigil-for-irving-gill%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%98windemere%e2%80%99/#comment-262791 Erik Fri, 03 May 2013 00:02:59 +0000 http://www.lajollalight.com/?p=100994#comment-262791 Bob: now you are really fishing. I was there the whole time and only about 5 cars passed down Virginia Way. The truck was probably a few inches past the limit. The street is extremely wide. If that hour-long event is the biggest safety hazard you can find in La Jolla, I'm guessing you haven't spent more than three minutes looking. Nobody was endangered and people were keeping their kids in check and out of private property. Any objective person would say it was you who had "no life" to make those comments. And, yes, we do have jobs and places we would have rather been, were there no need to be there. Bob: now you are really fishing. I was there the whole time and only about 5 cars passed down Virginia Way. The truck was probably a few inches past the limit. The street is extremely wide. If that hour-long event is the biggest safety hazard you can find in La Jolla, I’m guessing you haven’t spent more than three minutes looking. Nobody was endangered and people were keeping their kids in check and out of private property. Any objective person would say it was you who had “no life” to make those comments. And, yes, we do have jobs and places we would have rather been, were there no need to be there.

]]> http://www.lajollalight.com/2013/01/29/la-jollans-attend-vigil-for-irving-gill%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%98windemere%e2%80%99/#comment-261457 Joseph C Thu, 31 Jan 2013 22:38:08 +0000 http://www.lajollalight.com/?p=100994#comment-261457 Bravo! Well written and enlightened response! Bravo! Well written and enlightened response!

]]> http://www.lajollalight.com/2013/01/29/la-jollans-attend-vigil-for-irving-gill%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%98windemere%e2%80%99/#comment-261426 Bob Roberts Wed, 30 Jan 2013 06:07:17 +0000 http://www.lajollalight.com/?p=100994#comment-261426 By the way, looking at the first photo included with the story (Windmere Vigil 5), the blue truck is parked an illegal distance from the curb, creating a significant hazard in a public right-of-way that is a clear danger to public health and safety and the activities on the sidewalk also appear to be clearly an illegal obstruction of a public right-of-way which also very well could cause a serious injury or accident. Where are the police when you need them? Do these people involved have jobs/lives? By the way, looking at the first photo included with the story (Windmere Vigil 5), the blue truck is parked an illegal distance from the curb, creating a significant hazard in a public right-of-way that is a clear danger to public health and safety and the activities on the sidewalk also appear to be clearly an illegal obstruction of a public right-of-way which also very well could cause a serious injury or accident. Where are the police when you need them? Do these people involved have jobs/lives?

]]> http://www.lajollalight.com/2013/01/29/la-jollans-attend-vigil-for-irving-gill%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%98windemere%e2%80%99/#comment-261425 Bob Roberts Wed, 30 Jan 2013 06:01:37 +0000 http://www.lajollalight.com/?p=100994#comment-261425 If you bother to look at the houses nearby, the demolished house was an eyesore and probably a huge risk for fires and other issues which justified both the demolition and the desire to rebuild with more modern construction. People need to stop trying to control what others do with their property. Were the "negotiations" with the current owner demands that owner spend huge sums to do what these people wanted done? If they were willing to assume all costs and liabilities and compensate him for the lost use of the property during the time involved in moving the existing structure then perhaps they have an argument, but I doubt it. If you bother to look at the houses nearby, the demolished house was an eyesore and probably a huge risk for fires and other issues which justified both the demolition and the desire to rebuild with more modern construction. People need to stop trying to control what others do with their property. Were the “negotiations” with the current owner demands that owner spend huge sums to do what these people wanted done? If they were willing to assume all costs and liabilities and compensate him for the lost use of the property during the time involved in moving the existing structure then perhaps they have an argument, but I doubt it.

]]>