I'm no constitutional scholar but I'm pretty sure the right to free speech is guaranteed in the California Constitution as well. The language in the State Constitution and the CCA can be interpreted to support either side of this debate so citing out of context sections is pointless.

"Seals are not in need of 'special protection' no study has shown that they are in danger. Their numbers are growing."

No one's saying that harbor seals, as a species, are in danger. Citing "special protection" from the CCA has no relevance here. Thanks for sticking to facts at least.

CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION

ARTICLE 1, DECLARATION OF RIGHTS

Section 25. The people shall have the right to fish upon and from the public lands of the State and in the waters thereof, excepting upon lands set aside for fish hatcheries, and no land owned by the State shall ever be sold or transferred without reserving in the people the absolute right to fish thereupon; and no law shall ever be passed making it a crime for the people to enter upon the public lands within this State for the purpose of fishing in any water containing fish that have been planted therein by the State; provided, that the legislature may by statute, provide for the season when and the conditions under which the different species of fish may be taken.

ARTICLE 10, WATER

Section 4. No individual, partnership, or corporation, claiming or possessing the frontage or tidal lands of a harbor, bay, inlet, estuary, or other navigable water in this State, shall be permitted to exclude the right of way to such water whenever it is required for any public purpose, nor to destroy or obstruct the free navigation of such water; and the Legislature shall enact such laws as will give the most liberal construction to this provision, so that access to the navigable waters of this State shall be always attainable for the people thereof.

CALIFORNIA COASTAL ACT

Coastal Act Sections 30210 through 30213, as well as Sections 30220 and 30221 specifically protect public access and recreation.

 Section 30210 In carrying out the requirement of Section 4 of Article X of the California Constitution, maximum access, which shall be conspicuously posted, and Recreational opportunities shall be provided for all the people consistent with public safety needs and the need to protect public rights, rights of private property owners, and natural resource areas from overuse.

 Section 30211: requires that "Development shall not interfere with the public's right of access to the sea…"

 Section 30212(a): Public access from the nearest public roadway to the shoreline and along the coast shall be provided in new development projects

 Section 30213: Lower cost visitor and recreational facilities shall be protected, encouraged, and, where feasible, provided. Developments providing public recreational opportunities are preferred.

 Section 30220: Coastal areas suited for water-oriented recreational activities that cannot readily be provided at inland water areas shall be protected for such uses.

 Section 30221: Oceanfront land suitable for recreational use shall be protected for recreational use and development unless present and foreseeable future demand for public or commercial recreational activities that could be accommodated on the property is already adequately provided for in the area.

Shared use advocates need to stick to the facts and stop trying to label everyone who disagrees with them as a terrorist.

Funny use of that word isn't it? Id look it up in the dictionary if I was you.