<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Planning commission sends pot regulations to city council</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lajollalight.com/2011/01/20/planning-commission-sends-pot-regulations-to-city-council/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lajollalight.com/2011/01/20/planning-commission-sends-pot-regulations-to-city-council/</link>
	<description>Enlightening La Jolla since 1913</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 18:51:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: 921OB</title>
		<link>http://www.lajollalight.com/2011/01/20/planning-commission-sends-pot-regulations-to-city-council/#comment-54250</link>
		<dc:creator>921OB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 11:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lajollalight.mscsddev.com/?p=33560#comment-54250</guid>
		<description>Recommendation??  If these guidelines went through, there wouldn&#039;t be ANY dispensaries.  Don&#039;t you get what they&#039;re trying to do here?  Only 90 or so locations exist within those proposed zones, and out of those 90, who knows what is still available and if they&#039;re even willing to rent to dispensaries.    
  
The Council put together a specific &quot;Task Force&quot; for the purpose of coming up w/ those guidelines.  Why was this pushed aside 4 months ago when they came up w/ it? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recommendation??  If these guidelines went through, there wouldn&#039;t be ANY dispensaries.  Don&#039;t you get what they&#039;re trying to do here?  Only 90 or so locations exist within those proposed zones, and out of those 90, who knows what is still available and if they&#039;re even willing to rent to dispensaries.    </p>
<p>The Council put together a specific &quot;Task Force&quot; for the purpose of coming up w/ those guidelines.  Why was this pushed aside 4 months ago when they came up w/ it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://www.lajollalight.com/2011/01/20/planning-commission-sends-pot-regulations-to-city-council/#comment-53399</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 20:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lajollalight.mscsddev.com/?p=33560#comment-53399</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not about suffering patients--it&#039;s a zoning recommendation.  Where should they be located--no  cancer patient will suffer because they need to drive to a designated area to co-op their meds. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s not about suffering patients&#8211;it&#039;s a zoning recommendation.  Where should they be located&#8211;no  cancer patient will suffer because they need to drive to a designated area to co-op their meds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 921OB</title>
		<link>http://www.lajollalight.com/2011/01/20/planning-commission-sends-pot-regulations-to-city-council/#comment-53199</link>
		<dc:creator>921OB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lajollalight.mscsddev.com/?p=33560#comment-53199</guid>
		<description>Well City Council, it&#039;s up to you to carry out the voice of the people and voters (like you&#039;re supposed to), or be influenced by this reefer madness.   
  
The PC&#039;s recommendations pretty much zone out and ban the dispensaries.  Do they think that the users will just stop?  Odds are they&#039;re going to go just around the block from the shops and get it on the black market anyways.  Will that really help crime or would it support the cartels?    
  
For a &quot;progressive&quot; State and City to have this azz-backwards logic is very unfortunate.  Thankfully, I have my bong here to help make me smile  =-) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well City Council, it&#039;s up to you to carry out the voice of the people and voters (like you&#039;re supposed to), or be influenced by this reefer madness.   </p>
<p>The PC&#039;s recommendations pretty much zone out and ban the dispensaries.  Do they think that the users will just stop?  Odds are they&#039;re going to go just around the block from the shops and get it on the black market anyways.  Will that really help crime or would it support the cartels?    </p>
<p>For a &quot;progressive&quot; State and City to have this azz-backwards logic is very unfortunate.  Thankfully, I have my bong here to help make me smile  =-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://www.lajollalight.com/2011/01/20/planning-commission-sends-pot-regulations-to-city-council/#comment-53171</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lajollalight.mscsddev.com/?p=33560#comment-53171</guid>
		<description>The dispensaries aren&#039;t causing any problems now as clearly evidenced by the lack of police concern, but some people don&#039;t care if cancer patients suffer if it offends their delicate sensibilities.  This is just shameful. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dispensaries aren&#039;t causing any problems now as clearly evidenced by the lack of police concern, but some people don&#039;t care if cancer patients suffer if it offends their delicate sensibilities.  This is just shameful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
